A & MX records
I have Exchange 2007 setup in two separate forests without a trust relationship. Site 1 receives all incoming mail a forward the mail to site 2. Site 1 has and A record and a MX record for site 2 mail server name mail2.site2.local. Site 2 has decided to separate hub transport and client access roles by adding a second server call mail2.site2.local. Questions: Does site 1 have to add an A record for site 2 or will a MX record forward to mail2.site2.local without an A record.
July 23rd, 2009 9:06pm

Hi, An a record is required in your case. As the A record will point to the ip of HUB server which accepts the mail...... Thanks.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 23rd, 2009 9:11pm

Just to understand. The MX forwards mail to mail2.site1.local and on site1 the A record tells the MX record were the server is located. Correct
July 23rd, 2009 9:17pm

Hi, Ok -- Your mail server asks the DNS server what is the MX record of the domain to which you have to deliever the mail.... Now when it get the MX record entry it then tries to look for the ip of the server responsible for accepting the mails... As computers understand IP rather then names. Now when the mail server gets the ip address it makes smtp connection to the recieving mail server and asks whether he is the owner of the domain and has the mailbox for this uesr. If yes then it hand over the message to that server else you will receive the bounce back..... Thanks...
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 23rd, 2009 9:21pm

Thanks
July 23rd, 2009 9:42pm

Well, Dec0der has answered the question solidly Its important to notice if Hub server role were still on the original server, if yes, then we dont need to change the A/MX record since they have already pointed to the Hub server. However, if we separate Hub server role to that second server, the new A/MX record would be required. The key is to point the record to the Hub server on the site 2 (Forest 2)
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 24th, 2009 5:21am

Hi.. Just a small doubt here, we should have hub transport role in every site. Would it be possible if we have only one hub server role installed in one forest and we do not have hub role installed in another forest. I think this is not possible in Exchange 2007 enviornment. Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.Regards,Sunil Bansal
July 24th, 2009 9:19pm

Sunil, if a mailbox server does not have a hub transport server in the same AD site mail will not enter of leave mailboxes of users on that server. Mike Crowley A+, Network+, Security+, MCT, MCSE, MCTS, MCITP: Enterprise Administrator / Messaging Administrator
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 25th, 2009 6:17am

Sunil, You do not need to create any seperate records for your new HUB server as one DNS host record will create automatically when you install server in domain which help to find IP of new HUB servers. Regarding HUB server in single forest You must have at least one HUB server in EACH site as recommended by MS.Anil
July 25th, 2009 10:54am

hi,look at here ;http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Exchange-Server-2007-Email-Routing-Part1.htmlhttp://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Exchange-Server-2007-Email-Routing-Part2.htmlregards,Mumin CICEK | Exchange - MVP | www.cozumpark.com | www.mumincicek.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 25th, 2009 11:14am

Agree with Mike
July 27th, 2009 4:14am

Any update on this case?
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 29th, 2009 4:52am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics