Deleted PF still appears in GAL
Hi All, I had removed two PF from Active Directory, for some reason i used ADRestore.net tool to restore them. After that i had then i deleted it again. After a month till now those two PF's are still visible in GAL. I want to remove it manually. Please help. Regds, Ganesh
September 7th, 2011 12:39pm

Does it show in the GAL in owa or just the client? If just client could be bad cache\OAB issue. If it's showing in OWA then object still exists in AD. It's possible you could have a replication issue and still exists on one DC that Exchange is looking at.James Chong MCITP | EA | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+ Security+, Project+, ITIL msexchangetips.blogspot.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 7th, 2011 12:44pm

It appears both in Outlook GAL & in OWA. Its not OAB issue. I feel this is not replication issue as we have 11 additional domain controllers and all of them are connected as well.Regards, Ganesh
September 7th, 2011 2:26pm

If you do a search for that email address in AD nothing comes up? start, run, ldp connect, bind browse, search base dn: DC=domain,DC=com filter: proxyaddresses=smtp:DL@company.com scope: subtree James Chong MCITP | EA | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+ Security+, Project+, ITIL msexchangetips.blogspot.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 7th, 2011 2:33pm

I could see those two deleted objects when i ran ldp tool. Following are the output. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ***Searching... ldap_search_s(ld, "DC=abc,DC=com", 2, "proxyaddresses=smtp:oraclehcm@abc.com", attrList, 0, &msg) Result <0>: (null) Matched DNs: Getting 1 entries: >> Dn: CN=Oracle HCM,CN=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=abc,DC=com 2> objectClass: top; publicFolder; 1> cn: Oracle HCM; 1> distinguishedName: CN=Oracle HCM,CN=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=abc,DC=com; 1> name: Oracle HCM; 1> canonicalName: abc.com/Microsoft Exchange System Objects/Oracle HCM; ----------- ***Searching... ldap_search_s(ld, "DC=abc,DC=com", 2, "proxyaddresses=smtp:oraclerecruiting@abc.com", attrList, 0, &msg) Result <0>: (null) Matched DNs: Getting 1 entries: >> Dn: CN=Oracle Recruiting,CN=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=abc,DC=com 2> objectClass: top; publicFolder; 1> cn: Oracle Recruiting; 1> distinguishedName: CN=Oracle Recruiting,CN=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=abc,DC=com; 1> name: Oracle Recruiting; 1> canonicalName: abc.com/Microsoft Exchange System Objects/Oracle Recruiting; ----------- Regards, Ganesh
September 7th, 2011 2:47pm

They are matching for your public folders, is the smtp address currently being used for those public folders?James Chong MCITP | EA | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+ Security+, Project+, ITIL msexchangetips.blogspot.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 7th, 2011 3:01pm

Sorry, its my mistake its typo error. Yes those are public folders which i had deleted.Regards, Ganesh, MCTS, MCP, ITILV2
September 7th, 2011 3:03pm

Do the objects still show up in the AD meso OU (CN=Microsoft Exchange System Objects,DC=abc,DC=com) If so delete it from there as well.James Chong MCITP | EA | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+ Security+, Project+, ITIL msexchangetips.blogspot.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 7th, 2011 3:09pm

Yes, i had deleted as well. I will check and update the same. Thanks for your quick response i appreciate it.Regards, Ganesh, MCTS, MCP, ITILV2
September 7th, 2011 4:10pm

Please also checkthis: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/ad7620c6-b4ab-49a9-bce2-51770c3e50c4/ Hope it is helpful.Fiona
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 9th, 2011 2:05am

Any udpate? Fiona
September 13th, 2011 3:30am

I assume the issue is resolved and there is no problem.Fiona
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 14th, 2011 4:26am

Yes the issue is resolved thanks for all your help.Regards, Ganesh, MCTS, MCP, ITILV2
September 14th, 2011 9:36am

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics