Exchange 2013 Unified Messaging and Cisco Unified Communication?

I was looking at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee364753.aspx under "Supported IP PBXs" section, and it says:

IP PBXs are also supported by Unified Messaging. The following table shows the IP PBXs that are supported using a direct SIP connection to Exchange 2010 Unified Messaging.

IP PBXs supported when using a direct SIP connection

PBX manufacturer PBX model/type Required software version

Aastra

MX-ONE

4.0

Avaya

Aura

5.2.1 with Service Pack 5 (SP5)

Avaya

Communication Server 2100

CS2100 SE13

Cisco

Call Manager, Unified Communications Manager

5.1, 6.x, 7.0 and8.0

This is on a page for Exchange 2013, and I was confused. Could anyone verify that the above table for supported IP PBX's refelect Exchange 2013, not

February 1st, 2013 1:04am

The SIP connection is not changed in Exchange 2013 so the above list should be right
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
February 5th, 2013 5:41pm

The architecture has changed in 2013. The UM role is gone and the CAS sip redirects the call to the correct mailbox server. I am having the issue whereby CUCM won't action the SIP 302 redirect due to way it's sent in the contact section of the header

I currently have the 2010 config working fine with Exchange 2010 UM but not 2013

If anyone has got CUCM working with Exchange 2013 UM are you able to advise on your trunk settings?

-Daniel

August 29th, 2013 8:42am

Does anyone have a Solution to getting UM 2013 to work with CUCM.  I'm about to move from Exchange 2010. 

Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 23rd, 2013 4:47pm

Hello

I have integrated CUCM 8.6 and 9.1 with Exchange 2013 UM. Can you describe what is the problem? 

September 26th, 2013 6:49am

Hello

I have integrated CUCM 8.6 and 9.1 with Exchange 2013 UM. Can you describe what is the problem? 

Hi

We are trying to intergrate CUCM 9.1 and Exchange 2013 UM.

I can call into the UM from CUCM, although none of call forwards out of AutoAttendant (UM)  are working, I am getting message "Sorry I could not transfer you to the extension".

Dial Rules appear to be configured correctly



Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
September 30th, 2013 9:24pm

See https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/4054488 this is how I got the two working.
October 1st, 2013 2:11am

If your CUCM does not have DNS point your trunk directly to port 5062
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 1st, 2013 3:21am

Hello

I have integrated CUCM 8.6 and 9.1 with Exchange 2013 UM. Can you describe what is the problem? 

Hi

We are trying to intergrate CUCM 9.1 and Exchange 2013 UM.

I can call into the UM from CUCM, although none of call forwards out of AutoAttendant (UM)  are working, I am getting message "Sorry I could not transfer you to the extension".

Dial Rules appear to be configured correctly



October 1st, 2013 4:20am

Hi

I followed instructions but I am getting following messagein CUCM 9.1 (when I am trying to save second trunk)

Unmapped Exception The Destination Address "ex1.test.eu" conflicts with the Destination Address in "ex1.test.eu". Both have the same Incoming Port "5060" specified in their SIP Trunk Security Profiles. Update so that the Destination Addresses and Incoming Ports are unique.

we also have combined roles Mailbox and CAS on 2 servers (justlike the example on CISCO site)

i can not create tranks to mailbox and CAS servers using same SIP security profile (i.e. same incoming port 5060) and same server names (like described in the example)

Maybe I am missing something in this instruction


Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
October 6th, 2013 3:40pm

This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.

Other recent topics Other recent topics