Splitting Exchange servers and admin grants
There a company ABC with domain ABC.com and emails as roger@ABC.com
My company is a subsidary of ABC and is called XYZ.
We have AD server in common with ABC and mail as john@XYZ.ABC.com
Also MS Echange server is in common. It contains both the emails @ABC.com and @XYZ.ABC.com
In this situation ABC administrative group has full control of Echange server and can read all the mails. The XYZ administrator has no grants at all.
Now my question is: if we want to have a reasonable email confidentialy (ABC admins read ABS mail only) what are we supposed to propose?
If we had a separated Exchange box, would it be sufficient? Or is it necessary to have another AD server too? Where does the problem com from? from the forest settings? Can anybody give me some suggestions? Thank you
March 16th, 2010 8:42pm
You might consider Rights Management Server. Or
something like PGP so that private messages can be encrypted between the sender
before being sent, and decrypted after receipt.-- Ed Crowley
MVP"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
problems.".
"Franci_" wrote in message news:71b2e054-9213-4886-bea1-2103f6fc767f...
There a company ABC with domain ABC.com and emails as roger@ABC.com
My company is a subsidary of ABC and is called XYZ.
We have AD server in common with ABC and mail as john@XYZ.ABC.com
Also MS Echange server is in common. It contains both the emails @ABC.com
and @XYZ.ABC.com
In this situation ABC administrative group has full control of Echange
server and can read all the mails. The XYZ administrator has no grants at
all.
Now my question is: if we want to have a reasonable email confidentialy
(ABC admins read ABS mail only) what are we supposed to propose?
If we had a separated Exchange box, would it be sufficient? Or is it
necessary to have another AD server too? Where does the problem com from? from
the forest settings? Can anybody give me some suggestions? Thank
you
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
March 17th, 2010 7:51pm
Ultimately if privacy is a requirement, you need a separate resource forest (AD +Exchange servers) if only to be able to own control of the auditing of access. You could also move to BPOS for your organization and the mail would be out in the cloud instead of at rest on the ABC owned hardware.
March 17th, 2010 9:56pm
Ultimately if privacy is a requirement, you need a separate resource forest (AD +Exchange servers) if only to be able to own control of the auditing of access. You could also move to BPOS for your organization and the mail would be out in the cloud instead of at rest on the ABC owned hardware.
For BPOS you mean Business Productivity Online Standard Suite i.e. you delegate services to Microsoft?For AD+Exchange: so you mean it is simply impossible to block administrators of the main office? only solution is to have your own AD+mail system...Thank you
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
March 18th, 2010 7:49pm
It's not impossible if you block everyone from being a
domain administrator like I posted. But it might be nearly
unworkable. The Exchange forest is often promoted as the solution for this
dilemma, though I've never implemented it myself.-- Ed Crowley
MVP"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral
problems.".
"Franci_" wrote in message news:85881f2f-41fa-41ab-a417-02c03390a9e8...
Ultimately if privacy is a requirement, you need a separate
resource forest (AD +Exchange servers) if only to be able to own control of
the auditing of access. You could also move to BPOS for your
organization and the mail would be out in the cloud instead of at rest on
the ABC owned hardware.For BPOS you mean Business
Productivity Online Standard Suite i.e. you delegate services to
Microsoft?For AD+Exchange: so you mean it
is simply impossible to block administrators of the main office?
only solution is to have your own AD+mail system...Thank
you
Ed Crowley MVP
"There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
March 18th, 2010 8:57pm
On-promise exchange product is not the recommended or supported product for hosting multiple companies’ mail service, Andy has provided two options for you
Yes, you are correct about the BPOS product
James Luo TechNet Subscriber Support (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/ms788697.aspx) If you have any feedback on our support, please contact tngfb@microsoft.com
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
March 19th, 2010 10:13am