Windows Routing question
I have a Windows Server 2003 with dual NICs - the WAN facing NIC 192.168.25.2 and the other is 10.1.1.5.
While all traffic is flowing nicely (and has for years), I am attmepting to configure a firewall to aid in a VOIP installation. The problem that is hampering me appears to be a missing route.
If I take a laptop and assign it an IP address like 192.168.25.3 and put that laptop where the firewall usually sits I can NOT ping 10.1.1.5; tracert fails as well. Both tests behave as though they don't have any idea that 10.1.1.5 even exists.
Is there a route statement that I should add to make this work?
Destination
Netmask
Gateway
Interface
Metric
0.0.0.0
0.0.0.0
192.168.25.1
192.168.25.2
1
10.1.1.0
255.255.255.0
10.1.1.5
10.1.1.5
10
10.1.1.5
255.255.255.255
127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1
10
10.1.1.31
255.255.255.255
10.1.1.31
10.1.1.31
50
10.255.255.255
255.255.255.255
10.1.1.5
10.1.1.5
10
127.0.0.0
255.0.0.0
127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1
1
192.168.25.0
255.255.255.0
192.168.25.2
192.168.25.2
10
192.168.25.2
255.255.255.255
127.0.0.1
127.0.0.1
10
192.168.25.255
255.255.255.255
192.168.25.2
192.168.25.2
10
209.169.212.224
255.255.255.255
192.168.25.1
192.168.25.2
1
224.0.0.0
224.0.0.0
10.1.1.5
10.1.1.5
10
224.0.0.0
240.0.0.0
192.168.25.2
192.168.25.2
10
255.255.255.255
255.255.255.255
10.1.1.5
10.1.1.5
1
255.255.255.255
255.255.255.255
192.168.25.2
192.168.25.2
1
Default Gateway:
192.168.25.1
I'll happily provide additional info if it helps.
July 7th, 2010 12:27am
Hello,
please post an unedited ipconfig /all from the server and the machine you are talking about.
Also it is not really a good idea to use Windows server for routing instead a real router, which prevent you from lot's of problems.Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 7th, 2010 4:01am
Agreed about the "real" router versus a Microsoft solution but I'm sorta working with what I have here. We used to have an ISA solution in place but that has been since replaced by hardware firewall (which is what I'm attempting to use for a site-to-site
VPN solution).
And no, this isn't a NT4SERVER no matter what my config file may claim!
Windows IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : NT4SERVER
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : domain.com
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : Yes
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : domain.com
Ethernet adapter WAN:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection #
2
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-14-22-76-A5-65
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.25.2
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.25.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.5
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.5
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
Ethernet adapter Server Local Area Connection:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/1000 MT Network Connection
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-14-22-76-A5-64
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.5
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.5
Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.5
PPP adapter RAS Server (Dial In) Interface:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : WAN (PPP/SLIP) Interface
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-53-45-00-00-00
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.31
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.255
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . :
NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
July 8th, 2010 12:08am
Hi Toxteth_O'Grady ,
Thanks for posting here.
Please check if it worked with add another default route on your server which point to 10.1.1.0 segment :
Route delete 10.1.1.0
Route delete 10.1.1.5
Route add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.5
And please make sure IP forwarding enabled on your server
To enable TCP/IP forwarding, follow these steps:
·
Start Registry Editor (Regedit.exe).
·
In Registry Editor, locate the following registry key:
·
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters
·
Set the following registry value:
Value Name:
IPEnableRouter
Value type: REG_DWORD
Value Data:
1
A value of 1 enables TCP/IP forwarding for all network connections that are installed and used by this computer.
·
Quit Registry Editor and restart .
In addition, seems you had deployed VPN service on your server , remote and internal
in same IP segment. It’s not recommend because it will result many issues.
Thanks.
Tiger LiPlease remember to click Mark as Answer on the post that helps you, and to click Unmark as Answer if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 8th, 2010 9:24am
Thank you! I'll try this out and report back with the results.
July 8th, 2010 7:50pm
Nuts.
Didn't work. I lost all connectivity to the outside world when making the suggested changes to the route table.
I'm curious to other solutions if Tiger or anyone has suggestions. I think it would make sense to not have the two NICs in the server but that's a change that I hope to avoid making at this time.
Free Windows Admin Tool Kit Click here and download it now
July 15th, 2010 8:33pm
Solved and it's kind of ridiculous. Updated the drivers for my working NIC cards to a newer version and the VPN can now complete the path to the LAN side NIC.
I think there's a lesson in here somewhere...
August 2nd, 2010 9:15pm